United Kingdom: NICE changes its evaluation methods towards greater flexibility

Contents

NICE has produced a single guidance development manual, which describes how NICE conducts itself with each step and stage in its evaluation (NICE's processes) and how NICE collects and considers evidence (NICE's methods). The guidance development manual covers:

  • Diagnostic Assessments Programme
  • Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme
  • Highly Specialised Technologies Evaluation Programme
  • Technology Appraisal Programme

 

As reported by Digital Health Net, NICE has committed to a more modular approach to future updates to its methods and processes, identifying potential topics for future modular updates, including methods issues for digital, genomic and antimicrobial technologies, processes to enable rapid entry to managed access agreements, as well as further methods issues such as health inequalities and the societal value of health benefits in severe diseases.

 

NICE has also developed a new topic selection manual, setting out how NICE chooses medicines and other health technologies to evaluate.

 

The changes were intended to streamline and improve the way NICE undertakes health technology evaluation. Of the range of alterations NICE has made on how it evaluates health technologies, key changes include:

  • Looking beyond treatments used in palliative care to consider health benefits they may give in other severe conditions. 
  • Accepting a broader range of evidence to be included in the assessment process, including improving how NICE takes into consideration real-world evidence from patients' lived experiences.
  • Permitting more flexibility for NICE's independent committees in cases where evidence generation and collection is difficult, for instance, pediatric conditions, rare diseases or where the new treatment is innovative or complex. NICE's committees will be more enabled to consider uncertainty appropriately whilst managing patient risk, reducing inappropriate barriers to innovations.
  • Taking on a clearer vision, principles and routing criteria for very rare disease treatments, which NICE will evaluate under its Highly Specialised Technologies (HST) Programme, to improve the efficiency, predictability and clarity when routing topics to the HST programme, and build upon NICE's ambition to provide fairer NHS access to highly specialised medicines and treatments.
  • Advanced engagement with NHS England and NHS Improvement and companies regarding commercial / managed access proposals that allow NHS patients to receive treatment while further data is collected on its effectiveness. The circumstances in which NICE committees can make a managed access recommendation will be made clearer.
  • Aligning the methods and processes used across different types of evaluation to make health technology evaluation more pragmatic, agile, and robust, and thereby able to adapt to environmental changes and partner requirements.

 

The changes came into effect from 1 February for new evaluations. Evaluations that were already underway will continue to use the previous methods and processes.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.