Brazil and European Union: Adequacy Decision - European Commission publishes Draft Adequacy Decision recognizing Brazil’s data protection framework as adequate and initiates the formal process to enable the unrestricted flow of personal data from the EU to Brazil

In brief

On 5 September 2025, the European Commission published the Draft Adequacy Decision recognizing Brazil as a country that ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data, pursuant to Article 45 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This proposal marks the beginning of the formal procedure to authorize the transfer of personal data from the European Union to Brazil without the need for additional safeguards, effectively treating such transfers as equivalent to those occurring within the EU. The decision must still undergo several procedural steps, including the issuance of an opinion by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), approval by the Member States, and its subsequent adoption by the European Commission. Once formally adopted, the measure is expected to facilitate international data flows and strengthen regulatory cooperation between Brazil and the European Union in the field of data protection.


Contents

Further details

On 5 September 2025, the European Commission presented a draft adequacy decision regarding Brazil, recognizing that the country ensures a level of protection for personal data substantially equivalent to that required under the GDPR, in accordance with Article 45 of the Regulation. If confirmed, the decision will allow the transfer of personal data from the European Union to Brazil without the need for additional safeguards, such as standard contractual clauses or binding corporate rules, significantly simplifying the dynamics of cross-border operations. The European process, however, is not yet complete: the proposal must still be reviewed by the EDPB, approved by Member State representatives, and subsequently submitted to the European Parliament and the Council for formal adoption.

An adequacy decision, as provided for in Article 45 of the GDPR, has the legal effect of treating data transfers to a third country as if they were taking place within the Union. To that end, the third country’s legal framework must provide strong guarantees of respect for fundamental rights, oversight by an independent supervisory authority, and effective redress mechanisms. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, Canada, Argentina, and Uruguay have already received this recognition, forming a select group that Brazil may soon join.

In Brazil’s case, the assessment considered the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, or LGPD), constitutional guarantees of privacy and intimacy, and the role of the Brazilian Data Protection Authority (Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados, or ANPD) as an independent body with regulatory, supervisory, and enforcement powers. LGPD sets forth rights and principles that closely mirror those of the GDPR, including purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, and accountability. This alignment was further strengthened on 23 August 2024, when ANPD issued Resolution No. 19/2024, establishing the Regulation on International Data Transfers and approving Brazilian Standard Contractual Clauses (BR-SCCs). The regulation set a 12-month adaptation period, which ended on 23 August 2025, after which only SCCs approved by the authority, or instruments deemed equivalent by ANPD, became valid transfer mechanisms for compliance with LGPD. The framework also allows for the use of other mechanisms, such as binding corporate rules or specific clauses if authorized by the ANPD.

The publication of the draft decision by the European Commission takes place in parallel with the ANPD’s own efforts to finalize its technical and legal assessment aimed at recognizing the European Union as an adequate jurisdiction under the LGPD. If confirmed, this would establish a mutual recognition regime, consolidating regulatory interoperability and legal certainty between the two jurisdictions. According to ANPD, such assessment is in its final stages and should be concluded soon.

* * * * *

LOGO_TrenchRossiWatanabe_Brazil

Trench Rossi Watanabe and Baker McKenzie have executed a strategic cooperation agreement for consulting on foreign law.

Contact Information
Flavia Rebello
Partner
Trench Rossi Watanabe, Sao Paulo
Read my Bio
flavia.rebello@trenchrossi.com
Marcela Trigo de Souza
Partner
Trench Rossi Watanabe, Rio de Janeiro
Read my Bio
marcela.trigo@trenchrossi.com
Flavia Amaral
Partner
Trench Rossi Watanabe, Sao Paulo
Read my Bio
flavia.amaral@trenchrossi.com
Felipe Zaltman Saldanha
Partner
Trench Rossi Watanabe, Rio de Janeiro
Read my Bio
felipe.zaltman@trenchrossi.com

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.