Myanmar: Trade mark publication and oppositions | May 2024

In brief

The Myanmar Intellectual Property Department (MIPD) commenced publication of trade mark applications on 1 May 2024. These applications have passed the examination stage. The publication is for opposition purposes under the Myanmar Trademark Law 2019.


Contents

1. Publication of marks

The MIPD issued Journal TM/2024/01 on 1 May 2024, publishing the marks that were filed before the grand opening of the new electronic filing system on 26 April 2023, subject to completion of office actions in the examination stage (i.e., the distinctiveness of the mark, specifications, examiner requirements and formalities of the application). The publication of the marks is for opposition purposes. The information included in the Journal on published marks includes the representation of the mark, classes of goods and services, the applicant's information, color claims, and disclaimers, if any. Based on our discussions with MIPD, marks will be published on a monthly basis, but the frequency may change in the future.

2. Opposition

Any person may file an opposition against a published trade mark application to the MIPD within 60 days from the date of publication of the mark (1 May 2024 for the first Journal), in the prescribed form subject to the payment of the official fee (about USD 75). An opposition action may rely on absolute grounds such as non-distinctiveness or descriptiveness; and relative grounds such as being identical or similar to an earlier mark (including a well-known mark) or filing in bad faith.

This 60-day opposition deadline is non-extendible as there are no provisions in the Trademark Law for an extension of time, and we have confirmed this through our engagements with the MIPD. After this deadline has elapsed, the avenues for recourse will instead be through an invalidation or cancellation action against a trade mark registration.

There has yet to be any Myanmar guidance or case law with respect to the assessment of similarity under the Trademark Law 2019. We will provide an update on the assessment of similarity once available.

If a party to an opposition action is dissatisfied with the MIPD's decision, they may appeal to the IP Agency, which has been formed to hear appeals against the MIPD's decisions (among other purposes). The party may further appeal against the IP Agency's decision to the IP Court.

If no opposition is filed or the mark owner successfully defends the opposition, after 60 days, the marks will be allowed to proceed to registration.

Key takeaways

Trade marks will be granted registration after 60 days from the publication date. It is important to monitor the Myanmar Trade Mark Journal, to ensure that you are aware of any marks that are potentially similar to your brands. You can then decide whether to take any action, such as to proceed with filing an opposition action.

We are able to assist with monitoring publications, advising on the chances of success of an opposition, preparing and filing an opposition action, or defending against opposition actions. Please reach out if you have any questions, and we would be delighted to assist.   


We will continue to monitor these developments closely. Should you have questions or concerns, please contact any member of our team.

*****

Japanese version

Contact Information
Andy Leck
Principal
Singapore / Yangon
Read my Bio
andy.leck@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.