North America: When to patent and when to maintain as trade secret (Video Chat)

In brief

Companies routinely face the decision of when to patent innovations and when to maintain them as company trade secrets. A lack of clear strategy and focus can lead to the loss of important intellectual property. Sara Pitt and Kevin O’Brien, two members of Baker McKenzie's North America Trade Secrets Practice, offer their respective patent and trade secret litigation expertise to identify and advise on some of the most important topics in this context.


Contents

Work through the strategic challenges in determining when and how to protect your company’s innovations. These include factors such as (i) eligible subject matter for patenting, (ii) the effects of unintended publication, (iii) the ability to maintain innovations secret upon commercialization, and (iv) practical enforcement considerations.

Key summary

  • As recent case law affirms, important decisions on whether to patent or maintain as trade secrets must be made early on to avoid inadvertent loss of rights.   
  • Each type of innovation should be separately considered for its role in the overall intellectual property portfolio of the company. 
  • Some types of innovations are uniquely appropriate for patenting, some are best suited for trade secrets, and many fall within overlapping areas where a company could reasonably choose either course of action.

Speakers: Bradford Newman, Kevin O'Brien, Sara Pitt

Contact Information
Bradford Newman
Chair, NA Trade Secrets Practice
Palo Alto
bradford.newman@bakermckenzie.com
Kevin O'Brien
Partner, Intellectual Property
Washington, DC
kevin.obrien@bakermckenzie.com
Sara Victoria Pitt
Associate
Associate, Litigation & Government Enforcement
sara.pitt@bakermckenzie.com

© 2021 Baker & McKenzie. Ownership: This site (Site) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms, including Baker & McKenzie LLP). Use of this site does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All information on this Site is of general comment and for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulation and practice are subject to change. The information on this Site is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter, whether it be legal, procedural or otherwise. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any information provided in this Site. Baker McKenzie, the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Site. Attorney Advertising: This Site may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Site may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. All rights reserved. The content of the this Site is protected under international copyright conventions. Reproduction of the content of this Site without express written authorization is strictly prohibited.