Ukraine: UANIPIO launches Mediation Center with new opportunities for IP right holders

In brief

The Ukrainian National Office of Intellectual Property and Innovations (UANIPIO) has launched the Mediation Center ("Center") aiming to provide IP right holders with additional instruments for alternative dispute resolution in the field of IP.

The Center is a professional platform for resolving disputes through mediation in the field of IP. It provides organizational and technical support services of the mediation procedure and facilitates the organization of mediation processes in resolving IP disputes. Thus, the UANIPIO creates a platform for mediation where parties and mediators are the participants of the process. The Center provides access to the Register of Mediators, so that the parties can choose who to involve in the case. The mediators not only possess negotiation skills to resolve disputes, but also have thorough expertise in IP law, which helps to resolve the issue taking into account all the specifics of a particular industry. The Center provides an additional tool for IP rights holders to resolve disputes without litigation.


Contents

Key points

What is the difference between mediation and litigation?

Key diferences

Mediation within the Center may be initiated at the following stages:

  • Before applying to court, arbitral tribunal or international commercial arbitration
  • During the pretrial investigation, court, arbitral or arbitration proceedings
  • During the enforcement of a court decision, arbitral tribunal decision or international commercial arbitration award

When will you benefit from mediation?

Parties will benefit from mediation in the following circumstances:

  • Parties are from different countries.
  • There are multiple conflicts between the same parties.
  • Dispute involves several IP rights (e.g., EU-registered trademarks, nationally registered trademarks, registered or unregistered industrial designs, copyrights, patents).
  • Parties that were not involved in the original dispute must join the action.
  • There are obstacles to the enforcement of a court decision.
  • Confidentiality of the request, materials, discussions and results is important.
  • There is a need to use a single language during the process if the dispute involves representatives of different jurisdictions. In addition, the mediator may also address each party in their native language.
  • Parties to the dispute are interested in doing business in different areas or jurisdictions, and the parties' IP rights already coexist or may coexist.

How does the mediation work and how to initiate it?

Mediation

Recommendations

From a business standpoint, the establishment of the Center can be considered as a positive move, as the UANIPIO provides support with specialists and organizations helping parties resolve cases through mediation and negotiations. The Center will contribute to the effective resolution of IP cases at the pre-litigation stage due to the thorough knowledge of experts in the field of IP law, which is more time and cost-efficient.

If you have any questions regarding the mediation procedure, as well as the peculiarities and benefits of this process, please contact Partner Ruslan Drobyazko and Counsel Myroslava Koval-Lavok.

Ukrainian version


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.