United States: Key considerations in parallel criminal and civil trade secrets cases (Video Chat)

In brief

Companies who must confront parallel civil and criminal trade secret proceedings face many vexing strategic issues. Jessica Nall and Christine Streatfeild, two members of Baker McKenzie's North America Trade Secrets Practice, offer their respective white collar and IP expertise to identify and advise on some of the most important topics in this context.


Contents

Overcome strategic challenges when managing parallel civil and criminal trade secret proceedings.  These include (i) factors the government considers in initiating an investigation (ii) presenting the "trade secrets" to the government; (iii) whether to seek a stay of the civil proceeding and discovery implications of a stay, (iv) the length of a criminal proceeding; and (iv) the key differences in the way the government conducts its investigation verses discovery between parties in civil matters.

Key summary

  • Trade secrets theft can lead to both criminal and civil liability depending on the facts of the case.  
  • Where the conduct rises to the level of criminal culpability, companies should consider the impact of a referral to criminal authorities as well as making recourse to civil remedies.  If a criminal investigation is initiated, civil and criminal cases will proceed in parallel, presenting a unique set of challenges.
  • If a company finds itself facing such parallel proceedings, there are complex strategic tradeoffs to take into account, including whether to seek preliminary relief, how to proceed in seeking necessary discovery in light of pending criminal proceedings, and how to effectively coordinate and cooperate with prosecutors. 

Access the video chat recording here.

Additional resources

Strategies for parallel criminal, civil trade secret litigation1

 


1 https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1337028/strategies-for-parallel-criminal-civil-trade-secret-litigation-?nl_pk=e4eb5f01-48b4-446d-b782-6946c7722241&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ip

 


* * * * *

If you have any questions or need further clarification on any particular issue, please do not hesitate to get in touch with your usual contact at Baker McKenzie, or any of the lawyers listed here.


© 2021 Baker & McKenzie. Ownership: This site (Site) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms, including Baker & McKenzie LLP). Use of this site does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All information on this Site is of general comment and for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulation and practice are subject to change. The information on this Site is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter, whether it be legal, procedural or otherwise. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any information provided in this Site. Baker McKenzie, the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Site. Attorney Advertising: This Site may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Site may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. All rights reserved. The content of the this Site is protected under international copyright conventions. Reproduction of the content of this Site without express written authorization is strictly prohibited.