Vietnam: From tariffs to takedowns — doubling down on IP enforcement

In brief

In April 2025, the United States announced its intention to impose a steep 46% reciprocal tariff on imports from Vietnam, citing concerns over trade imbalances, alleged transshipment practices aimed at circumventing duties, and persistent issues related to counterfeit goods and intellectual property (IP) violations.

For Vietnam, a heavily export-driven economy closely tied to the US market, this move was a wake-up call. Strengthening IP protection is not just a legal matter; it has become a strategic imperative for maintaining credibility and access in global trade.

This article explores how Vietnam is responding through legal reforms, enforcement actions and international cooperation, and what businesses should be watching next.


In depth

A foundation already in motion: pre-tariff reforms

Even before the US tariff announcement, Vietnam had taken significant steps to modernize its IP landscape.

In 2022, the government implemented wide-ranging amendments to its IP laws. These changes aimed to bring Vietnam's legal framework closer to international standards, particularly in emerging areas like digital content and software, and to boost investor confidence.

By mid-2024, momentum picked up further. Plans to establish specialized IP courts, long requested by international stakeholders, gained traction. The courts are expected to be established in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City and are designed to improve consistency and expertise in IP rulings, addressing a long-standing gap in enforcement infrastructure.

At the same time, Vietnam started making headlines with landmark enforcement actions in the digital space. In 2024, the country issued its first-ever criminal sentence for online copyright infringement, targeting the operator of a pirated movie streaming platform. Months later, the authorities worked with international rightsholders to shut down Fmovies, a site widely known as the world's largest piracy ring. These developments sent a clear message: Vietnam is serious about IP enforcement.

Escalating action: post-tariff crackdown

Following the tariff announcement, Vietnam accelerated its efforts with a comprehensive crackdown on counterfeit goods and trade fraud, demonstrating domestic resolve and responsiveness to international concerns.

In May 2025, the prime minister launched a nationwide campaign to combat smuggling and counterfeit goods. An interministerial task force was mobilized to lead investigations, prioritize high-risk sectors and enforce compliance.

Targeted industries include pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, dietary supplements, petroleum and tobacco, sectors where the risk of counterfeits or origin mislabeling is especially high. Online marketplaces have also come under sharp scrutiny, with stricter advertising and labeling rules introduced to curb the flow of illicit goods through digital channels.

Crucially, enforcement has gone beyond policy. Field operations have stepped up dramatically. In one high-profile case, authorities raided Saigon Square, a bustling commercial hub in Ho Chi Minh City, seizing thousands of counterfeit luxury items. Similar raids occurred in Da Nang and Hanoi, focusing on knockoff fashion, cosmetics and other unauthorized products.

Border control has also intensified. Customs officers are conducting enhanced inspections of imported goods carrying well-known international brand names to prevent fake products from entering the Vietnamese market.

Strengthening global ties

Vietnam is not acting alone. On the international stage, the country has ramped up collaboration with key partners.

Data-sharing with the US is being used to track and prevent transshipment risks. Meanwhile, cooperation with organizations like the Business Software Alliance is targeting the persistent issue of unlicensed software, a major concern for global firms operating in Vietnam.

These efforts are beginning to yield measurable results. According to reports from government-run media outlet, enforcement activity peaked in May 2025, when authorities addressed nearly 4,000 cases. The total value of penalties and seized goods during that month exceeded USD 2.4 million, underscoring the scale and intensity of the crackdown.

What's next: opportunity and caution

Vietnam's multifaceted approach, combining legal reform, proactive enforcement and international cooperation, makes one thing clear: IP protection is now a national priority. This shift is not just about ticking compliance boxes; it is about safeguarding access to global markets and attracting long-term investment.

For brand owners and investors, the takeaway is clear: stronger enforcement is encouraging, but vigilance is still necessary. Identifying where risks remain, and taking steps to protect your brand, will be essential.

*****

Tuan Linh Nguyen, Senior Government Affairs Manager, has contributed to this legal update.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.