Asia Pacific: RCEP - Coming into force on 1 January 2022

In brief

Following the ratification of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) by Australia and New Zealand, the largest regional free trade agreement outside the World Trade Organization — involving 10 ASEAN countries and five non-ASEAN countries including China, New Zealand, Australia, Japan and South Korea — is set to come into force on 1 January 2022.

Covering 20 chapters relating to trade in goods and services, movement of people, investment, intellectual property, e-commerce, competition, government procurement and dispute settlement, RCEP will create new trade and investment opportunities among the participating countries that represent roughly 30% of the world's population.


Contents

Walk-through of RCEP ratification timeline

RCEP will enter into force for the participating member states that have deposited their instrument of ratification 60 days after the date on which at least six ASEAN member states and three non-ASEAN member states have ratified RCEP.

On 3 November 2021, the ASEAN Secretariat has announced that RCEP will enter into force on 1 January 2022 for the initial ratifying members as they have received Instruments of Ratification/Acceptance from six ASEAN member states and four non-ASEAN member states as follows:

Ratification status ASEAN member states Non-ASEAN member states
Ratified Singapore
Brunei
Thailand
Lao PDR
Cambodia
Vietnam
China
Japan
New Zealand
Australia
Pending ratification Malaysia
Indonesia
Philippines
Myanmar
South Korea

 

The member states will continue the requisite preparatory work and finalize the technical and institutional aspects of RCEP to establish a solid foundation for the complete and effective implementation of the agreement in early 2022.

Updates on the remaining member states

On 2 December 2021, the National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee of South Korea voted to ratify RCEP. The ratification will need to pass the assembly's plenary session before the ratification is formally completed. Malaysia, on the other hand, is intensifying its efforts to complete the necessary amendments to the existing legislations to enable Malaysia to ratify RCEP. The Malaysian Trade minister has indicated that Malaysia will ratify RCEP by the end of 2021.

The Philippines is also doubling its efforts to complete the ratification process within 2021. The president approved the necessary documents for RCEP in September 2021, and the same will be tabled at the Senate for concurrence in due course. For Indonesia, while the government has indicated its intention to ratify RCEP soon, there has been a delay given other more pressing domestic issues, including the management of COVID-19. Lastly, there has been no express indication of the ratification timeline by Myanmar since the political coup this year.

What should businesses do in preparation for RCEP?

As RCEP has reached a new milestone and will become effective from the start of 2022, businesses should consider whether they are able to take advantage of any benefits offered by RCEP, including, among others:

  • Customs duty planning and mitigation: RCEP aims to reduce or eliminate customs duties imposed by each member state on originating goods by approximately 92% over 20 years. In particular, businesses with supply chains involving Japan, China and South Korea may take note that RCEP establishes a free trade relationship between the three nations for the first time.
  • Further optimization of supply chain: As RCEP consolidates members of the existing ASEAN +1 agreements with the five non-ASEAN member states, this provides greater ease in meeting the regional value content requirements through the cumulation rule. As such, businesses may enjoy greater sourcing options as well as have more flexibility in optimizing their manufacturing processes within the 15 member states.
  • Nontariff measures: Nontariff measures on importation or exportation between member states are prohibited under RCEP, except in accordance with the rights and obligations under the WTO Agreement or RCEP. Quantitative restrictions made effective through quotas or licensing restrictions are generally to be eliminated.
  • Trade facilitation: RCEP stipulates trade facilitation and transparency measures, including procedures for approved exporters to make declarations of origin; transparency around import, export and licensing procedures; issuance of advance rulings; prompt customs clearance and expedited clearance of express consignments; use of IT infrastructure to support customs operations; and trade facilitation measures for authorized operators. For trade between certain countries, greater trade facilitation may be expected as RCEP introduces the option to self-certify the origin of goods through declaration of origin, as self-certification may not be available under certain ASEAN +1 agreements (e.g., the ASEAN-China FTA).

The authors:

Anne Petterd (Partner, Sydney), Riza Buditomo (Partner, Jakarta), Ivy Tan (Senior Associate, Singapore) and Kin Fui Ho (Legal Assistant, Kuala Lumpur)


Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.