Indonesia: Customs targets examination of companies that utilize under-name import

18 Sept 2023    2 minute read
Importation

In brief

On behalf importation, locally known as "under-name importation"  or "QQ" importation, has been used by companies for more than a decade, ever since the Directorate General of Customs and Excise ("Customs") first allowed the name of the owner of goods to be included in the import declaration form ("PIB").

Under Indonesia's Customs Law, the importer of record is the party that is subject to an audit or a re-examination (Penelitian Ulang), and there is no audit or re-examination of the owner of goods in a PIB using under-name importation.

However, in mid-August this year, the Minister of Finance (MoF) issued Regulation No. 78 of 2023 on Re-examination in the Field of Customs ("MoF Regulation No. 78/2023"), which will come into force on 21 October this year. One of the objects of re-examination is the owner of goods.

Contents

In more detail

Practice of under-name imports

In certain circumstances, companies carry out under-name importation because they do not yet have the required licenses (such as basic import/business licenses or additional import licenses) to import goods into Indonesia. Typically, these companies are companies that need to import goods during their establishment stage or companies that do not have sufficient import quotas.

In these cases, an import agent, as a service provider, is stated as the importer of record, while the beneficial owner of the goods is stated as the owner of the goods (Pemilik Barang) in the PIB, as shown below:

CASE2447430

So in the PIB, there are two different columns for the importer of record and for the owner of goods when an importer of record acts as the importer 'on behalf' of the owner of goods

New provisions and implications for companies

Customs is authorized to carry out an examination of every importer and exporter within 30 days to two years after the date of the PIB and export declaration form (PEB) − in the form of an audit or a re-examination.

However, the MoF introduced a new provision on the re-examination procedure in MoF Regulation No. 78/2023 where one of the objects of re-examination is the owner of goods. Customs will request data or documents, verbal or written information, and samples of goods from the owner of the goods through the importer stated in the PIB or the exporter stated in the PEB. If the importer, exporter or owner of goods cannot satisfy the request, Customs can issue a warning letter, and eventually can suspend import and/or export services if the parties do not comply with the warning letter.  

In addition to this, we also believe that the MoF will introduce a similar provision on the customs audit procedure where the owner of goods would become an audit target.

Therefore, with the new provision, companies that are beneficial owners of the goods will also be 'exposed' to Customs scrutiny.

* * * * *

LOGO_Indonesia HHP Law Firm_Jakarta

© 2023 HHP Law Firm. All rights reserved. HHP Law Firm is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International. This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information
Irvan Ardiansyah
Associate Partner
Jakarta
irvan.ardiansyah@bakermckenzie.com
Nandina Kusumaningrum
Trade Specialist at BakerMcKenzie
Jakarta
nandina.kusumaningrum@hhplawfirm.com

Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.