United States: Nationwide preliminary injunction on Corporate Transparency Act enforcement

Tax News and Developments

In brief

Update to below posting:  On December 26, 2024, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals rescinded its December23,  2024, decision that reinstated beneficial ownership reporting. The effect of the December 26 rescission is that the injunction preventing enforcement of beneficial ownership reporting by the government is back in effect and currently there is no obligation for reporting companies to file beneficial ownership reports. 

In response to this latest court order, FinCEN has noted the following on its webpage: "In light of a recent federal court order, reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while the order remains in force. However, reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports."


Contents

Summary

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) requires "reporting companies" to file "beneficial owner" information and "company applicants" ("BOIR") with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as early as January 1, 2025. In a "last minute" December 3, 2024 decision, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland1, issued an order (Court Order) temporarily enjoining the US government from enforcing the CTA and CTA regulations. Specifically, the Court Order:

  • Stayed the CTA's January 1, 2025 filing deadline for BOIR required filed by domestic and foreign reporting companies that were formed or registered before 2024, and
  • Enjoined the US government from enforcing the CTA and the implementing regulations as promulgated by FinCEN.

 

Observation

Based on the plain language of the decision, while FinCEN's enforcement of the CTA against all reporting companies is preliminarily enjoined, the BOIR filing stay does not appear to apply to the 90-day BOIR filing deadline for reporting companies formed or registered during 2024. However, FinCEN's alert posted on its website on December 6, 2024 (FinCEN Alert) states that in light of the Court Order, reporting companies are not currently required to file BOIRs with FinCEN and will not be subject to liability if they fail to do so while the Court Order remains in force.2 The implication of the FinCEN Alert is that CTA penalties will not be imposed as long as the Court Order remains in effect to reporting companies:

  • Formed or registered before 2024 that had a January 1, 2025 filing deadline,
  • Formed during 2024 that had a 90 day filing deadline, or
  • That had a 30-day deadline to file a corrected or updated BOIR.

Nevertheless, FinCEN confirmed in the FinCEN Alert that reporting companies may continue to submit BOIR voluntarily.

Under these circumstances, officers of such companies responsible for BOIR, in particular foreign reporting companies, should consider applicable duty of confidentiality under contractual arrangements or foreign privacy laws before filing with FinCEN its BOIR or before obtaining FinCEN identifier voluntary.

In any case, it would be prudent for reporting companies to continue to gather their beneficial ownership information for filing of FinCEN identifiers or for the initial, correct, or updated BOIR, as applicable. In this manner, the reporting companies will be prepared to make the filings if or when again required to do so.

In more detail

As background, the CTA and regulations thereunder went into effect January 1, 2024. Passed back in January 2021, the CTA requires "reporting companies" to file a report regarding their BOIR. More than 32 million entities are expected to file BOIR to FinCEN.

FinCEN released the final regulations regarding BOIR requirements on September 29, 2022 and regarding access to BOIR by individuals and entities other than FinCEN on December 22, 2023, both of which were effective as of January 1, 2024. The CTA regulations require domestic and foreign reporting companies formed or registered before 2024 to file their initial BOIRs by January 1, 2025, and domestic and foreign reporting companies formed or registered during 2024 to file their initial BOIRs within 90 days after formation or registration. The filing requirements are discussed in detail in our previous client alert, Corporate Transparency Act ─Three Months In.

The Court Order imposes a preliminary injunction, and the Top Cop Shop Court has not issued a final decision as to the constitutionality of the CTA or its implementing regulations as promulgated by FinCEN. However, the Court found that the CTA and its implementing regulations are "likely unconstitutional" for purposes of issuing the preliminary injunction. The preliminary injunction should remain in place until further order of the Court. An appeal by the US government has been filed.

Reporting companies appear to continue to have a legal obligation to file their BOIRs. However, due to the Court Order stay of the January 1, 2025 deadline and FinCEN confirmation that it will not enforce any of the CTA compliance deadlines, reporting companies may wait to file BOIR until further guidance is issued by FinCEN or the Court Order is overturned.

The Court Order's BOIR filing stay arguably applies only to the January 1, 2025 compliance deadline for reporting companies formed or registered before 2024. The plain language of the decision does not appear to apply to the 90-day BOIR filing deadline for reporting companies formed or registered during 2024 or to the 30-day deadline to correct previously filed BOIRs. However, based on the FinCEN Alert, as long as the preliminary injunction under the Court Order remains in effect, FinCEN will not impose the daily monetary penalties to reporting companies that do not file their initial, corrected or updated BOIR.

As a reminder, the CTA imposes criminal and civil penalties for willfully providing false or fraudulent beneficial ownership information, or willfully failing to report complete or updated beneficial ownership information. A violation may result in a civil penalty of USD 500 per day for each day that the violation continues or is not remedied, or a criminal fine of not more than USD 10,000, imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. A safe harbor (i.e. no civil or criminal penalties) may apply if a person has reason to believe a submitted report contained inaccurate information and within 90 days "voluntarily and promptly" submits a corrected report. However, the safe harbor is not available if the person knowingly submitted false information in the first report.

Reporting companies should continue to monitor any guidance from the Court in Top Cop Shop, US Treasury, and FinCEN to confirm any updates to their filing obligations accordingly. As an observation, even if the current Department of Justice seeks to overturn the Top Cop Shop decision on appeal, it is noteworthy that in 2021, then-President Trump vetoed the CTA. His veto was ultimately overridden by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. This may be an indication that new Department of Justice leadership would not seek to defend the CTA.

As a reminder, as posted on the FinCEN website, among other pending lawsuits, on March 1, 2024, the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Northeastern Division, entered a declaratory judgment, determining that the CTA violates the Constitution's limits on Congress's power and enjoining US Treasury and FinCEN from enforcing the CTA against the specific plaintiffs, namely: Isaac Winkles, reporting companies for which Isaac Winkles is the beneficial owner or applicant, the National Small Business Association (NSBA) and NSBA members.3 FinCEN has stated in a prior notice posted on its website that it will comply with the court order for as long as it remains in effect in respect of the plaintiffs in the case, currently pending on appeal by the US government.


1 Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, No. 4:24-cv-00478 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2024).

2 Original content updated after the release of FinCEN alert.

3 National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.).


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.