Australia: Merger reform update - Treasury and ACCC Consultation Paper proposes ‘user pays’ merger review fees

In brief

On 5 June 2025, the Australian Treasury (Treasury) and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released a joint consultation paper detailing a proposed cost recovery mechanism for fees for applications under the new mandatory merger control regime. The proposed cost recovery fees are significant, ranging from AUD 8,300 for a notification waiver, up to AUD 952,000 for a Phase 2 assessment.  Stakeholder feedback will be used to inform final advice to Government on the fees ultimately imposed.

The consultation paper can be found here, and the closing date for submissions is 18 June 2025.


Contents

In more detail

From 1 January 2026, merger parties must notify the ACCC of acquisitions that meet the prescribed thresholds (see our previous alerts outlining the new regime here and here) with merger parties able to make voluntary notifications under the new regime from 1 July 2025 (for example, if their merger may not be assessed by 31 December 2025).  Notification waivers are only available from 1 January 2026.  

Treasury and the ACCC are proposing to shift the costs of merger review away from the taxpayer to the merger parties in the form of "cost recovery fees".  According to the consultation paper, the proposed fees are scaled to the complexity of the merger review and will ensure that the ACCC is "adequately resourced to administer the new merger system efficiently".  The proposed fee amount was determined by "dividing the total cost incurred per type of review by the estimated volume of assessments per year".

The consultation paper proposes the following fees (to be indexed annually):

Type of review

Proposed fee (exclusive of GST)

Notification waiver application

(only applicable from 1 January 2026)

AUD 8,300

Phase 1 assessment

AUD 56,800

Phase 2 assessment

AUD 952,000

Public benefit application

AUD 401,000

 

The proposed fees represent a substantial change to the current position and will significantly increase the costs to merger parties of obtaining ACCC merger clearance.  The proposed fees do not vary according to the size of the transaction (as is the case for Foreign Investment Review Board fees or for merger filings in some overseas jurisdictions such as the United States) or size of the acquirer.  The only proposed exemption is for acquisitions by small businesses with an aggregated turnover of less than AUD 10 million.

In the first full year of the new regime, the ACCC indicated it expects to conduct an estimated "100 waiver reviews, 335 Phase 1 reviews, 15 Phase 2 reviews and 3 public benefit reviews".  Businesses will not incur additional fees for any extensions to the review timelines. 

The process under the new merger regime, with the proposed fees to be incurred by the merger parties for each phase, is summarised in the flowchart below.

If you have questions about the new merger control system, or are interested in making a submission, please contact us.

This alert was prepared with the assistance of Emma Panhuber, Naasha Loopoo and Hayley Bonu.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.