United Kingdom: Government consults on facilitation of Defined Benefit surplus extraction and Pension Protection Fund public consolidator

In brief

Following the Mansion House policy announcements made in July 2023 in relation to defined benefit pension schemes and the subsequent call for evidence (published in November 2023), the Government has published a formal consultation setting out further details of its proposals. It is seeking views from the industry in two areas: (1) facilitating surplus extraction from Defined Benefit (DB) schemes and (2) establishing a public sector consolidator operated by the Pension Protection Fund (PPF). The consultation closes on 19 April 2024.


Contents

What is being consulted on?

Surplus extraction

Noting the Pensions Regulator's recent estimates that 3.750 DB schemes out of approximately 5.000 schemes are in surplus and the fact that trustees may wish to share the surplus with members and sponsoring employers in recognition of their historic contributions, the Government wants to introduce measures to make surplus extraction easier. Having already published a call for evidence in November 2023 on this issue, the Government is now consulting on its proposals.

The Government's stated aims in the surplus part of the consultation are to:

  1. Support schemes to invest surpluses in productive asset allocations (as part of the Government's wider 'productive finance' agenda).
  2. Remove practical barriers to surplus extraction (e.g., scheme rule restrictions).
  3. Remove 'behavioural barriers' by bringing surplus extraction in line with trustee duties. 

The Government is, however, clear that surplus should only be extracted where safe to do so from a member benefit perspective.

The specific proposed changes being consulted on are:

  • To introduce a 'statutory override' so that trustees are not prohibited from extracting surplus as a result of restrictions in trust deeds and rules. This is in response to concerns put forward in the Call for Evidence, and would either be provided via a trustee power to amend their trust deed and rules or a specific power to make surplus payments. 
  • To potentially facilitate one-off surplus payments by amending tax legislation so that this would not constitute an 'unauthorised payment' to members. 
  • To ensure that member security is preserved following surplus payment, a number of eligibility criteria are being considered, including various proposed qualifying funding criteria and an additional minimum covenant requirement. 
  • As an alternative safeguard, the Government is consulting on the potential introduction of a system where payment of a PPF 'super levy' could be made in exchange for the PPF offering 100% PPF compensation to the pension scheme.

PPF public consolidator

The second part of the Government consultation set out further details of the proposal, first announced as part of the Mansion House programme last year, to establish a new public consolidator for smaller, less well-funded DB pension schemes, by 2026. This would be operated by the Pension Protection Fund but kept separate from the main PPF funds. The main aim is to provide an alternative end-game solution for schemes that might otherwise be unattractive to commercial consolidation providers.

The consultation focuses on potential eligibility criteria and sets out the proposed structure for the new consolidator. Currently, it is intended that the consolidator will operate like a superfund so that the link between the employer and pension scheme will be severed on transfer. It will also be structured as an unsegregated fund, on a run-on basis. It is further proposed that the consolidator would pay the full actuarial value of member benefits but under a small number of standardised benefit structures. In terms of funding, it is anticipated that a minimum funding level would be imposed similar to that currently proposed for commercial superfund consolidators, and that would dictate the entry price. Any deficit on entry would have to be paid by the employer over time under a separate contractual agreement.

The Government is asking the industry additional questions on possible options to underwrite the new consolidator - either by the Government itself or by PPF general reserves. The consultation also includes a survey for DB schemes aimed at gathering information on the level of DB schemes' interests in these new policies to inform the final design. Schemes have until 19 April 2024 to respond.

Key takeaways

Unless you wish to respond to the DB survey contained in the consultation or the consultation more generally, there are no immediate steps for schemes to take at this time. However, if you have any queries, please speak to your usual Baker McKenzie contact.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.