United Kingdom: Work and Pensions Committee publishes report on use of LDI in DB pension schemes

In brief

Following the Government’s “mini budget” of September 2022 and the ensuing crisis in the “Liability Driven Investment” (LDI) market, The House of Commons’ Work and Pensions Committee (WPC) published a report in June on the use of LDI by DB pension schemes, which notes that “there is still more work to be done” to address weaknesses in the LDI regime.  

The WPC report is comprehensive and includes 10 principal recommendations for the Government and key regulators like the Pensions Regulator, the FCA and the PPF in connection with the future use and governance of LDI arrangements. Several of the Committee’s recommendations also cover wider issues affecting the DB pension scheme industry, such as the timing of a Government consultation response on DB consolidation (which was recommended to be provided by the end of October 2023 and was published on 11 July) and the halting of the proposed DB funding regime changes. The Government is due to respond to the report by 23 August 2023 and no immediate action is required of trustees at this time.


Contents

For further information on the circumstances that led up to the LDI crisis and the initial action taken to stabilise the LDI markets, please see our previous February 2023 update and our June 2023 update.

Further background

The WPC launched an inquiry in October last year into the use of LDI in DB pension schemes, following the events of September 2022 in the aftermath of the “mini budget”.  Evidence was requested on various matters relating to the LDI crisis, including in relation to the Pensions Regulator’s approach to regulating and monitoring LDI and whether DB schemes had adequate governance arrangements in place to cope with what happened.  Oral evidence was heard late last year and earlier this year and further regulatory interventions followed, including the publication of detailed guidance from the Pensions Regulator on the use of LDI arrangements in April 2023. The final WPC report was published on 14 June, and much of the report focused on the WPC’s recommendations for the industry and its regulators. 

Focusing first on the recommendations that are most likely to lead to additional or altered obligations for trustees, we would draw out the following as being most relevant:

  • The Pensions Regulator should require trustees to report certain data on their use of LDI and should develop a strategy for engaging more closely with schemes.
  • In addition to putting in place mechanisms to provide real-time warning of reductions in LDI resilience, the DWP and the Pensions Regulator should consult on whether introducing disclosure requirements on pension schemes relating to the use of LDI through the annual report or investment statement would help improve standards of governance. Particular consideration should be given to: 
    • The maximum leverage allowed in the LDI funds in which the scheme is invested
    • The type of LDI the trustees invest in
    • Compliance with minimum resilience levels
    • Data on the pension schemes’ asset allocations, by growth and matching assets. 

In terms of related recommendations which are likely to affect wider areas of Government and regulatory policy, the WPC also recommended that:

  • The DWP and the Pensions Regulator halt their existing plans for a new funding regime, at least until a full impact assessment has been prepared.
  • The DWP respond to its consultation on DB consolidation no later than the end of October 2023, and it should then work with the Pensions Regulator “as a priority to improve the regulation of trustees and standards of governance”. Please note that the Government published its consultation response on DB consolidators on 11 July, together with a separate “call for evidence” on pension trustee skills, capability, and culture. We will be reporting on these developments separately. 

The WPC noted that their key concerns with the DB funding proposals, as currently formulated, were that the proposed approach was not sufficient to allow open schemes to thrive and that they will result in greater “herding” in investment decisions by trustees (i.e., a majority of trustees following similar funding and investment strategies, thereby exacerbating systems risk to the economy). In relation to further DB consolidation, the WPC commented that this was a step towards improving trustee governance.  The WPC even suggested that, whilst these governance improvements are carried out, the DWP should consider whether the use of LDI by trustee boards should be restricted, for example by reference to a test related to a trustee board’s ability to understand and manage the risks involved.  

The WPC also included various recommendations for the wider industry, together with expected timescales.  These include a swathe of further Government and regulatory reports, including a DWP, Pensions Regulator and PPF account of the impact on pension schemes of the LDI episode (due by the end of the year), a further report from the DWP and the Pensions Regulator on how they plan to monitor whether LDI resilience is being maintained and a DWP report on how it proposes to take forward the FPC’s recommendation that TPR be given a remit to take account of financial stability (potentially in its statutory objectives).   The report also recommends the bringing forward of Government plans for investment consultants to be brought within the FCAs regulatory perimeter.

Next steps

The Government is due to respond to the WPC’s report by 23 August 2023. While the WPC report only contains recommendations for the pensions industry and they have no formal legal status, we would expect the DWP and the Pensions Regulator to be directed by the report’s findings. Trustees need not take any immediate action in relation to the WPC’s report at this stage, and should continue to comply with the Pensions Regulator’s current guidance on LDI arrangements. However, trustees and their investment advisers should be mindful of the Government’s possible direction of travel in this area in the future, which is likely to involve closer monitoring and further supervision of trustees’ LDI arrangements.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.