International: Uptiering in European leveraged finance — does the Serta decision move the needle?

In brief

Welcome to the June edition of In the Know, Baker McKenzie's Leveraged Finance newsletter that analyzes significant trends and salient legal issues for participants in leveraged finance and high yield markets around the globe.

In this edition, we discuss the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas ruling in favour of Serta Simmons Bedding LLC's ("Serta") Chapter 11 reorganisation plan on 6 June 2023. Judge David R. Jones' decision confirmed the reorganisation plan and validated Serta's 2020 non-pro rata uptiering exchange offer.


Contents

Whilst the judgment appears to give the green light to certain uptiering transactions in the US (if the documentation — as with the debt buyback provisions in Serta's case — so permits), several obstacles / protections (depending on your point of view) remain in the European market. Regardless of geography, it is clear now more than ever that careful drafting is required to preserve or deny the flexibility required for these transactions. Or to put it in more neutral terms, to ensure that the parties' collective understanding of the terms of the transaction is reflected. The importance of knowing and understanding your terms cannot be overstated.

Key takeaways

  • The decision confirms that it is possible for transactions that favour a certain group of lenders to pass judicial muster, at least in the US courts. This could go some way to mitigating litigation risk and might encourage more borrowers to consider similar transactions.
  • To avoid uncertainty, parties should define key terms and express their intent in full in the drafting, rather than relying on the court's or the market's interpretation. This is particularly important in European deals, as the lack of litigation means even less certainty around interpretation.
  • Although the decision in the US to approve the Uptiering Transaction, and the continuing loosening of terms, have led to concerns that similar transactions could become a feature in Europe, certain factors continue to present a barrier to similar transactions in Europe.
  • Their ultimate use will remain highly fact- and document-dependent, and particular attention should be paid to the "amendments and waivers" provisions to determine whether lenders are protected from the introduction of a super-priority debt without all lender consent.

Click here to access the article.

 

To read more from our 'In the know' series please click here.

To sign up to receive our 'In the know' newsletter, please click here.

Contact Information

Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.