Colombia: Industry Alert - New tax ruling on Significant Economic Presence

Colombian Tax Office (DIAN) clarifies its interpretation on relevant issues regarding this topic

In brief

The Colombian Tax Office (DIAN) issued the Tax Ruling No. 305[008717] of 30 April 2024, interpreting several matters regarding the application of the Significant Economic Presence rules. The following are the most relevant points addressed by the Ruling:

  • Cases in which the deduction for payments abroad related to SEP transactions are not capped under article 122 of the Tax Code.
  • Identification of SEP taxpayers that have opted for the filing/no WHT mechanism and those who are not subject to the regime.
  • Scope of the activities that can be considered taxed under SEP rules.
  • Comments on the priority order rules of withholding agents.

In which cases income tax withholdings (WHT) are not required as a deductibility requirement for SEP transactions performed between Colombian users/clients and foreign providers?

  • DIAN explains the two exceptions that allow the withholding agent not to apply WHT under the SEP regime:
    1. When the non-resident is registered in the Unique Tax Registry – ((RUT) by its acronym in Spanish) as a SEP taxpayer, not subject to withholding tax.1
    2. When the non-resident submits a communication under oath, stating that it does not meet the SEP criteria.
  • In any of these situations, the Colombian client/user will not be required to demonstrate the application of the 10% WHT and the expense will be fully deductible.

How should a non-resident demonstrate that it is not subject to the SEP WHT? 

  • In the case of registered taxpayers, it is necessary to submit a copy of the RUT to the Colombian clients, showing code 65, corresponding to "taxpayer with SEP in Colombia". Under this code, it shows it is subject to the regime but not to the WHT mechanism.
  • Non-residents who do not meet the SEP criteria, must submit a communication under oath, in which an authorized signatory states not meeting the corresponding requirements. Applicable legislation does not establish additional formalities for the validity of this communication.
  • If Colombian customers/users do not have any of these documentary supports, and fails to withhold, the deduction of the payments performed will be limited to 15% of its net income, calculated before deducting such costs or deductions.

Which activities are included within the scope of the SEP rules, and which are not?

  • It is clarified that the services of exploitation or leasing of real estate located in Colombia are taxed under ordinary income tax rules, and not under the SEP regime , if the activity is performed by the owner of the real state directly.
  • The import of goods may be considered as a taxable SEP activity when it meets the requirements of gross income2 and deliberate and systematic interaction,3 and at least two of the location criteria set by the secondary legislation, such as:
    1. The domicile or where the client and/or user usually resides or lives is in Colombia.
    2. Payments are made through credit, debit or other types of cards or bonds or through any payment mechanism, located in Colombia.
    3. The credit or debit card through which the payment of the operation is made was issued in Colombia.
    4. The shipping address for the sale of goods is located in Colombia.
    5. The Internet Protocol (IP) address of the device used by the client and/or user is located in Colombia, at the time of performing the operation.
    6. The mobile country code (MCC) of the international identity of the mobile service subscriber stored on the SIM card (subscriber identity module) used by the client and/or user locates it in Colombia.
  • The DIAN reaffirms that only services that can be categorized as "digital services"4 under the terms of the law and the regulations will be within the scope of the SEP rules.

When are financial institutions entitled not to withhold, and who should apply the WHT in those cases?

  • In the event that the financial entities do not have the necessary information to apply the WHT, nor can they obtain it, the payment gateways will be in charge of making the withholding.
  • However, the DIAN interprets that in such a situation, the financial entity must demonstrate that it does not have the information despite having requested it from the payment gateways and other parties related to the payment of the goods or services covered by SEP rules.

1 Code 122 must be included in the field 89 of the Tax Registration. 

2 Obtaining 31.300 tax units from SEP activities with Colombian clients/users in the current or previous FY, equal to approximately USD 368.283 for 2024.

3 Conducting interactions with 300.000 or more clients/users located in Colombia; and/or showing prices or allowing to perform transactions in Colombian Pesos.

4 Those services provided through the Internet or an electronic network in an automated manner that require minimal human participation by the service provider and are impossible to guarantee in the absence of information technology.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.