Germany: Tour operator margin scheme

In brief

Germany | Federal Ministry of Finance denies TOMS for non-EU operators effective 1 January 2021

The German Ministry of Finance issued a decree on 1 February 2021 stating that tour operators who are not established in the EU with their headquarters or a fixed establishment may not use the tour operators' margin scheme simplification (TOMS). Tax offices are instructed not to object to the application of this simplification up until assessment periods in 2020. However, as from 1 January 2021 the simplification (TOMS) are denied.


Contents

Travel services rendered by a non-EU travel operator under the TOMS so far were considered out of scope of German VAT because their tax place was deemed to be at the place where the operator had established its business. At the same time, the operator was not entitled to deduct input VAT charged by travel services providers (e.g. hotels). If the simplification does not apply going forward, such travel services could be taxable in Germany (depending on the circumstances, e.g. as property-related accommodation services) and require a VAT registration in Germany. The VAT would not be calculated on a margin but on the full sales price. At the same time, the operator would now be able to deduct input VAT on the travel services procured from the travel service providers.

Notably, by the letter of the German law and its systematic interpretation the simplification would appear to apply to non-EU operators as well. The German TOMS law and its reference to the general place of supply rule does not expressly make a difference between EU and non-EU TOMS-suppliers. The Ministry of Finance based its decision to deny the TOMS-regulation on an interpretation of the EU VAT Directive, which arguably provides that the travel services, as an exception from the general tax place rules, shall be taxed only in the "Member State" of the tour operator (e.g. Art 307). The Ministry of Finance appears to have concluded that the TOMS-simplification may apply only when an EU Member State ultimately taxes the travel service.

As a general principle, a court should not interpret the German VAT law beyond the reasonable (or possible) meaning of its wording. It is therefore not clear at this point whether German TOMS rules could be applied (by a tax court) in line with the assumed meaning of the EU law as suggested by the Ministry in this particular case. It must be noted, however, that the German Federal Tax Court has occasionally restricted or extended the application of the German VAT Act even beyond its wording in the past (i.e. to align German VAT law with EU VAT law based on teleological considerations). Moreover, it appears possible that the Ministry's interpretation of the law will even be adopted into the German VAT Act on the next occasion so that the German law would more clearly reflect the Ministry's understanding of EU VAT law on TOMS for future filing periods.

Regardless of these considerations, it is not clear at this stage whether the Ministry's restrictive understanding of the EU Directive is actually the correct interpretation of the TOMS rules under EU law (which may ultimately need to be interpreted by the European Court of Justice in case of controversies). The relevant Art. 306 and 307 of the EU VAT Directive do not necessarily limit TOMS expressly to EU-based companies at least when describing the actual material requirements for the application of TOMS.

The implications of the tax decree can be material for non-EU operators in terms of the compliance efforts but also more broadly in terms of the possibly required (re)structuring of business operations and cooperation with travel service providers. Changes to the business models should be considered urgently because the tax decree applies retroactively for the month of January 2021. Tour operators could also decide to question the Ministry's interpretation of the law, ask for tax rulings or even litigate. In any event, non-EU operators that decide to oppose the Ministry's view and to keep applying the TOMS are well advised to inform the tax authorities accordingly (because it can generally be considered as a tax offence to go against the tax authorities' publicized positions without at least giving them the opportunity to review and object).


Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.