Netherlands: Dutch position on Amount B published

In brief

On 4 December 2024, the Dutch Ministry of Finance published the 27 November 2024 Decree No. 2024-0000528135 ("Amount B Decree 2025"), outlining the Netherlands' position on the application of the OECD IF's Pillar One Amount B as of 1 January 2025.

Based on the Amount B Decree 2025, Amount B will not be introduced for Dutch taxpayers, but it may become relevant for taxpayers with baseline marketing and distribution activities in covered jurisdictions.


Contents

In more detail

With this announcement, the Netherlands became the second European jurisdiction to issue guidance on the application of  Amount B, following Ireland.

The decree is a brief two-page document that summarizes the international agreement of the Inclusive Framework on Pillar One Amount B and its implications in the Netherlands. Below we summarize the main features of the Amount B Decree 2025:

  • Amount B will not be introduced for Dutch taxpayers conducting activities in the Netherlands that are in scope for Amount B (i.e., baseline marketing and distribution activities).
  • However, the Netherlands commits to accepting the outcomes of Amount B as applied by entities performing baseline marketing and distribution activities in a "covered jurisdiction" with a bilateral tax treaty concluded with the Netherlands. This would, therefore, currently concern 29 countries.1
  • The wording of the Amount B Decree confirms that, from a Dutch perspective, the existing bilateral tax treaties with covered jurisdictions would be sufficient to effectuate the commitments under this decree. In other words, adoption of the Model Competent Authority Agreement on Amount B (MCAA) would not be necessary from a Dutch perspective when a double tax treaty is in place.
  • In effect, such commitment implies that when Amount B is applied by taxpayers located in the respective covered jurisdictions with which the Netherlands has a double tax treaty, in a manner that adheres to the guidance provided in the Annex to Chapter IV of the OECD Guidelines, the Netherlands will take steps to prevent or eliminate double taxation by:
  1. Applying unilateral corresponding adjustments for Dutch taxpayers to reflect the outcomes of Amount B, as applied by foreign entities engaged in routine marketing and distribution activities.
  2. Engaging in consultation procedures (e.g., Mutual Agreement Procedure) regarding the application of Amount B by a covered jurisdiction and accepting the Amount B outcome if Amount B is adopted by such covered jurisdiction.
  3. Committing not to impose adjustments related to the remuneration of routine marketing and distribution activities in such covered jurisdiction, provided that there is a proper application of Amount B.
  • The Amount B Decree 2025 applies to qualifying transactions between separate legal entities and also for determining the allocation of profits to permanent establishments.
  • The Amount B Decree 2025 will take effect on 1 January 2025, which aligns with the timeline set by the OECD.

1 The Netherlands currently has bilateral tax treaties in force with the following covered jurisdictions: Albania, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Egypt, Georgia, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Philippines, Serbia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam, and Zambia.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.