Russian Federation: Russia ready to withdraw from tax treaty with Cyprus

In brief

On 3 August 2020, the Russian Ministry of Finance announced1 that it is ready to terminate the double taxation treaty with Cyprus.2 Despite Russia's attempts to convince Cyprus to raise dividend and interest withholding tax rates (see Legal Alert dated 14 April 2020), the countries have not reached a mutually acceptable agreement yet. If the next round of negotiations, scheduled for August 10-11, fails to produce results, the Treaty could be terminated as early as January 1, 2021.

In parallel, the Ministry is preparing legislation that would limit the ability to apply a “look-through” approach to some Cypriot and analogous conduit structures.

These measures will sharply increase the tax burden on payments to Cyprus, lead to double taxation of certain kinds of income and create the risk of dual tax residency for companies and individuals.


Practical recommendations

Companies and individuals whose tax structures rely on the Treaty are advised to:

  • analyze the implications of the Treaty's termination for entities that make income payments from Russian sources (dividends, interest, royalties, income from the lease or sale of property, etc.);
  • consider making the maximum allowed amount of income payments from Russia before the end of 2020;
  • look into the possibility of transferring Cyprus companies to other jurisdictions (taking into account Russian and European anti-avoidance rules and rules on the disclosure of information on cross-border transactions3);
  • identify and review corporate and contractual structures that the Russian or foreign tax authorities may view as aggressive tax planning schemes;
  • consider whether a “look-through” approach may be applied for payments to Cyprus companies, including in cases where the beneficial owner of the income is a Russian tax resident;
  • assess the risk that the Treaty's termination may lead to individuals and companies being considered tax residents of both Russia and Cyprus simultaneously, and determine ways to minimize this risk;
  • assess the implications of the potential inclusion of Cyprus on the Russian Finance Ministry’s “blacklist”4 after the termination of the Treaty.

If your company decides to change its business structure, review its contractual relationships, or make payments from Russia before the end of 2020, we recommend taking the necessary steps as quickly as possible. That said, we also underscore the importance of complying with Russian law when considering a restructuring, as the Russian tax authorities are likely to regard such changes with increased scrutiny.

Russian Version

1. Press release of the Russian Ministry of Finance.
2. Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Cyprus and the Government of the Russian Federation for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed 5 December 1998 (the “Treaty”).
3. Including the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) and the amended EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation (DAC6).
4. “List of states and territories providing a preferential tax regime and/or not disclosing information when carrying out financial transactions (offshore zones)” established by Order of the Ministry of Finance of Russia No. 108n dated 13 November 2007.

Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.