Spain: The Spanish Central Tax Court has issued a recent case in which it analyzes the qualification of certain insurance services as ancillary of a leasing service

In brief

The Inquirer is an entity that performs a vehicle-leasing activity, with other additional services such as insurance contracts.


Contents

The Spanish Central Tax Court states, based on the ECJ case C-349/96, Card Protection Plan, that for leasing contracts accompanied by additional performance or insurance contracts signed together, it is necessary to distinguish (i) the case in which there are multiple services and (ii) the case that has a main operation with other ancillary services. Specifically, in the first case, the operations are perceived as substantive by the customers, so they receive something additional that is useful for its value.

In this particular case, the tax court concluded that the following services are qualified as multiple services:

a) Insurance for civil liability: The tax court concluded that taking into account the content of this insurance (which is the damage caused to a third party with the vehicle) clearly constitutes an additional and substantive supply, with its own utility as perceived by the client.

b) Insurance for own damages in the vehicle: The same conclusion is reached by the tax court taking into account the optional character of this insurance, which is based on the way its price is determined (depending on the accident rates of the client and its separate formalization).

c) Self-insurance: In this type of insurance, the entity assumes the risk of the damages covered thus adding a surcharge.

As far as those types of services should be considered as independent, they should also be considered exempt for VAT purposes, so the VAT paid and affected to exempt activities should not be deductible.

Finally, this analysis is independent of the analysis that has to be made for "flexible" or "short-term" leasing, in which the insurances services are not independently offered and are included in the lease offered to the client. In this case, the tax court considered that the insurance services mentioned are ancillary to the principal transaction, that is, the leasing.

***

We remain at your disposal for any consultations or clarifications regarding this alert, and we will keep you informed of any future changes regarding these issues as they become available.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.