United States: A question of fact - Illinois tax tribunal denies summary judgment motion in unitary business case

In brief

In July, the Illinois Tax Tribunal released an order denying a taxpayer’s motion for summary judgment in a “unitary business” case, finding that there were disputed issues of fact as to whether the taxpayer was engaged in a unitary business with a company that the taxpayer sold.


Contents

In depth

In July, the Illinois Tax Tribunal released an order denying a taxpayer’s motion for summary judgment in a “unitary business” case, finding that there were disputed issues of fact as to whether the taxpayer was engaged in a unitary business with a company that the taxpayer sold. The taxpayer, a passive holding company, asserted that the gain from the sale of its partnership interest in an operating company could not be included in the holding company's Illinois business income, because the holding company and the operating company were not "unitary" under US Constitutional standards and Illinois law. The Tribunal determined that whether or not the holding company and the operating company were unitary was a "question of fact" that precluded summary judgment in favor of the taxpayer. The Tribunal’s decision highlights the general notion that the existence of a unitary relationship between two business enterprises, or between a business enterprise and an asset, is a highly fact-intensive inquiry. Notably, the Tribunal's decision also supports the proposition that a passive holding company can be — but is not per se— engaged in a unitary business with an operating company that it owns. In other words, the Tribunal’s order confirms that the same fact-intensive unitary analysis should be undertaken whether a holding company or an operating company is the taxpayer at issue a conclusion that has not always been consistently reached by state authorities.

For more information, please see “A Question of Fact: Illinois Tax Tribunal Denies Summary Judgment Motion in Unitary Business Case” on the SALT Savvy blog, available at https://www.saltsavvy.com/

 

Contact Information
Maria Eberle
Partner at BakerMcKenzie
New York
maria.eberle@bakermckenzie.com

© 2021 Baker & McKenzie. Ownership: This site (Site) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms, including Baker & McKenzie LLP). Use of this site does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All information on this Site is of general comment and for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulation and practice are subject to change. The information on this Site is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter, whether it be legal, procedural or otherwise. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any information provided in this Site. Baker McKenzie, the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the contents and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Site. Attorney Advertising: This Site may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Site may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. All rights reserved. The content of the this Site is protected under international copyright conventions. Reproduction of the content of this Site without express written authorization is strictly prohibited.