United States: Foreign US military base consulting services are foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) eligible

Tax News and Developments September 2024

In brief

A recent memorandum from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Chief Counsel (202436009) provides valuable guidance on the eligibility of services provided to the US government at a location outside the United States for the foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI) under section 250(b)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code.


Contents

Key takeaways

The IRS Office of Chief Counsel advice has implications for businesses performing consulting and other services for US government agencies abroad, clarifying that such services can benefit from the foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) deduction.

In depth

The FDII regime, introduced as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, is designed to incentivize US businesses to engage in foreign activities by offering a deduction on income derived from the export of property and services. FDDEI is a key input in the FDII calculation, and section 250 provides rules for determining FDDEI for both property and services transactions. With respect to services, section 250(b)(4)(B) explains that FDDEI is income derived from providing services to any "person" or property located outside the United States. FDII is the deduction taxpayers can claim on a portion of the income that qualifies as FDDEI.

The recent IRS memorandum clarifies that the US government, including its agencies and instrumentalities, can be considered a "person" for purposes of FDII eligibility. The memorandum references existing case law and regulatory guidance, including Supreme Court decisions, to support the interpretation that the US government can qualify as a "person" when determining FDDEI. Therefore, the services provided to the US Department of Defense (DoD) or other federal agencies abroad may qualify for FDDEI, despite the recipient being a part of the US government.

A significant takeaway from this memorandum is that the nationality of the recipient of the services is irrelevant for determining FDDEI eligibility. The regulations emphasize that what matters is the recipient's location outside the United States, which means that services provided to US government employees, contractors, or agents on foreign military bases or other foreign locations fall within the scope of FDDEI.

In the scenario the memorandum addresses, a domestic corporation providing consulting services to US DoD personnel located on a military base in a foreign country ("Country X") is eligible to treat income from these services as FDDEI. This is because the services were provided to a recipient located outside the US, and the US DoD, as a US government agency, can be treated as a "person" under section 250(b)(4)(B).

This interpretation opens the door for companies engaged in various service industries—including consulting, engineering, logistics, and IT—to claim FDII benefits for services provided to US government entities operating abroad. US companies that regularly provide services to government entities stationed or operating outside the US, such as military contractors and consulting firms, may now be eligible for the FDII deduction on income derived from contracts with the US government. This can result in significant tax savings for qualifying companies, enhancing the competitiveness of US businesses in foreign markets.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.