United States: Senators introduce bill aimed at radically altering the tax consequences of carried interest

In brief

In his American Families Plan, President Biden called for carried interest, the interest in a fund’s profits granted to a fund manager, to be taxed as ordinary income rather than capital gain. Earlier this month, Democratic Senators upped the ante by introducing a bill that proposes to also end deferral of carried interest recognition, whether or not there has been a realization event, and tax deemed compensation to fund managers as ordinary income.


Contents

In more detail

On 5 August 2021, Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., introduced the “Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act” (S. 2617) (“bill”) aimed at completely ending the preferred tax treatment afforded to carried interest. The bill is designed to end both preferential capital gain tax treatment and the deferral of income recognition to the holders of a carried interest.

Chairman Wyden’s proposal intends to accomplish these goals by conceptually treating a carried interest like a borrowing of capital by the carried interest holder from the other investor-partners. As a result, carried interest holders would recognize on an annual current basis an amount of ordinary income essentially akin to the annual imputed forgone interest of such borrowing. The imputed interest deemed forgiven by the lender-partners becomes taxable income each year. The imputed-interest is calculated at a high rate. This amount of “deemed compensation” to the carried interest holder would be subject to ordinary income tax rates and self-employment taxes. 

An example provided in the news release accompanying the introduction of the bill shows the intent of the proposed legislation: “[I]f the fund manager receives a 20 percent carried interest in exchange for managing investors’ capital of USD 100 million, and the prescribed interest rate for the tax year is 14 percent, the fund manager would pay the top ordinary income tax rate of 40.8 percent tax on USD 2.8 million in deemed compensation.” The bill provides for an offsetting long-term capital loss in the amount of the deemed compensation, but such loss may or may not provide a tax benefit to a particular taxpayer in such year depending upon their specific situation.

It is critical to be aware that this proposal intends to cause compensation income every year to the carried interest holder. This is the case whether or not there has been a capital or other realization event by the partnership and corresponding distributable cash from an investment sale or disposition. In other words, this proposal creates annual phantom income to the holder of a carried interest. The bill is similar to a previous carried interest bill proposed by Chairman Wyden, but this proposal now has greater chance of passage given the recent shift in power to the Democrats and the instructions to the Finance committee to prepare its portion of USD 3.5 trillion reconciliation bill contemplated by the budget resolution passed by the Senate. As a result, the bill cannot be ignored. 

If you have any questions about this proposed legislation, please contact the Baker & McKenzie attorney with whom you usually work, or the authors of this client alert. This is an opportune and critical time to have an influence on the final outcome of any legislation regarding carried interest. If you would like to get involved in the legislative process, please contact Alexandra Minkovich of Baker McKenzie’s tax policy group (+1 202 452 7015, Alexandra.Minkovich@bakermckenzie.com) for further information on legislative opportunities.

Other US Tax News and Developments

United States: Treasury and the IRS extend continuity safe harbor for renewable energy projects

United States: A question of fact - Illinois tax tribunal denies summary judgment motion in unitary business case

United States: Supreme Court denies review of New Hampshire's lawsuit against Massachusetts

United States: More privacy for nonprofit donors

United States: To Trust or Not to Trust — Florida's new statutes pave the way for expansion of individual’s succession planning opportunities

United States: New QOZ amendments area mixed bag, giving both clarification and ambiguity

Contact Information
Samuel Grilli
Partner
Chicago
+1 312 861 2522
samuel.grilli@bakermckenzie.com
Russell Lawson
Associate
Chicago
+1 312 861 2771
russell.lawson@bakermckenzie.com

Copyright © 2022 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.