Australia: Government moves on new prominence framework and anti-siphoning reforms

The Australian Government has proposed legislation that would introduce new obligations for internet connected TV devices and expand Australia's anti-siphoning scheme

In brief

On 29 November 2023, the Australian Government introduced the Communications Legislation Amendment (Prominence and Anti-siphoning) Bill 2023 ("the Bill"), which proposes measures aimed at facilitating access to free-to-air television content for Australian audiences. If passed, the Bill will amend the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) (BSA) and Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005 (Cth) to:

  • Establish a "prominence framework" imposing obligations on manufacturers of regulated connected television devices to ensure that certain services provided by Australian free-to-air television broadcasters are available and accessible on their devices.
  • Reform Australia's existing anti-siphoning scheme to prevent media content services (including streaming services) from acquiring a right to provide coverage of an event on the anti-siphoning list until a free-to-air broadcaster has obtained a right to televise the event on a broadcasting service.

Contents

The government has also published an exposure draft of a proposed new anti-siphoning list, which would expand the current list by adding certain women's sporting events and events held as part of the Paralympic games.

The Bill has been referred to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee for review, with the Committee's report due by 26 March 2024. The Committee is accepting submissions on the Bill until 22 January 2024, which can be made online here

Key takeaways

  • The new prominence framework would require manufacturers of regulated connected television devices to comply with a set of "minimum prominence requirements" related to the accessibility on their devices of certain broadcasting services and broadcasting video on demand (BVOD) services. The requirements will be prescribed in regulations, with an exposure draft set to be released in early 2024.
  • Manufacturers of regulated television devices and their related bodies corporate would be prohibited from supplying a device that is not compliant with the new framework and obliged to take reasonable steps to ensure their devices continue to be compliant after they are supplied. The new obligations would only apply to devices manufactured on or after the day, that is, 18 months from when the amendments commence.
  • The new anti-siphoning scheme would expand the existing scheme to apply to online streaming services and extend the automatic delisting period for events on the anti-siphoning list from six months to 12 months.
  • Significant new penalties will apply for contravention of both the new prominence framework and the revised anti-siphoning scheme. For a body corporate, the maximum penalty will be the greater of:
    • 10,000 penalty units (AUD 3.13 million at the current penalty unit rate).
    • Three times the value of the benefit obtained as a result of the contravention.
    • 2% of the annual turnover of the body corporate during the last 12 months if a court cannot determine the value of the benefit obtained from the contravention.

The new prominence framework

The new prominence framework would target manufacturers of "regulated television devices" (covering certain internet-connected television devices designed for viewing television, such as smart televisions, set-top-boxes, and plug-in devices) by regulating the accessibility and prominent display of "regulated television services" (being broadly national television broadcasting services and certain app-based BVOD services provided by Australian free-to-air broadcasters).

At the core of the prominence, framework would be a set of "must-carry obligations", which would require device manufacturers to comply with "minimum prominence requirements" to be prescribed by regulations. The proposed must-carry obligations in the Bill require that manufacturers of regulated television devices (and their related bodies corporate):

  • Must not supply devices in Australia if they do not comply with the minimum prominence requirements.
  • Must take reasonable steps to ensure devices continue to comply with the requirements after they are supplied.
  • Must not charge a regulated television service provider in relation to the device complying with the requirements.
  • Must take reasonable steps to ensure that the audiovisual content provided by a regulated television service is not altered or interfered with.

The Bill sets out a number of items the minimum prominence requirements may address, including access to regulated television services on the device; the display, location, or positioning of the regulated television service on the device; and the installation, availability, and updating of BVOD apps. While the regulations prescribing these requirements are yet to be released, the government has announced it intends to require manufacturers of regulated television devices to:

  • Provide access to regulated television services, including by pre- or auto-installation of regulated television services on their devices; and
  • Present tiles, tabs, or links for live television and BVOD services in a similar size and format as the tiles, tabs, or links for other content services (such as streaming services) that are made available on the device.

The Australia Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) will have information-gathering and enforcement functions and powers in relation to the new prominence framework. An entity that breaches the must-carry obligations in the framework may be liable for significant civil penalties, as outlined in the Key Takeaways above.

The revised anti-siphoning scheme

Australia's existing anti-siphoning scheme – which has been in place for close to 30 years – prevents pay television broadcasters from obtaining the rights to events specified on an anti-siphoning list made under the BSA within a certain period unless a free-to-air broadcaster has acquired rights to televise the event.

The Bill proposes to expand the scope of the anti-siphoning scheme to include media content service providers (such as providers of streaming services), which were previously not restrained from acquiring rights to events on the anti-siphoning list ahead of Australia's free-to-air broadcasters. Conversely, the Bill will also bring forward the delisting time prior to the start of events: an event will be automatically delisted 8,760 hours (approximately 12 months) prior to its start time (currently, this period is set at 4,368 hours, approximately six months) unless the relevant Minister declares that the event is to remain in the list. Rights to delisted events may be acquired without restriction.

The government is also proposing to further expand the anti-siphoning list, by adding events held as part of the Paralympic Games, as well as women's sporting events in the fields of AFL, NRL, and cricket. This follows amendments to the anti-siphoning list in September 2023 to add selected FIFA Women's World Cup matches.

ACMA will have information gathering and enforcement functions and powers in relation to the reformed anti-siphoning scheme. As outlined in the Key Takeaways above, significant penalties may apply for a contravention of the scheme.


We want to thank Renata Beris, Summer Clerk at Baker McKenzie and Kirsten Foley, Graduate at Law at Baker McKenzie for their contribution to this alert.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.