Singapore: Government in talks with Australia on potential social media ban for children

In brief

On 28 November 2024, the Australian Government passed a law banning social media for children under the age of 16. The Australian Government's recent move has raised questions in Singapore on the assessment and effectiveness of such bans, and whether there is a possibility of introducing a similar ban in Singapore.

These questions were addressed by the Ministry for Digital Development and Information (MDDI) during the parliament sitting on 7 January 2025.


Contents

In more detail

The Minister of State of MDDI highlighted that Singapore shared the same objectives as Australia of protecting children and youths from the harms of social media access and that the MDDI was engaging its Australian counterparts and social media platforms to better understand their views.

The MDDI also highlighted its recent efforts to protect children on social media, including the introduction of the Code of Practice for Online Safety, which requires designated social media services to put measures in place to enhance the safety of Singapore users, particularly for children. These measures include having more restrictive account settings for children and providing tools for parents to manage their children's safety.

The MDDI also emphasised that it has taken decisive steps to require the implementation of age assurance methods to minimise children's access to harmful content. For instance, the upcoming Code of Practice for Online Safety for App Distribution Services will require designated app distribution services to put measures in place to establish the age or age range of a user with reasonable accuracy and ensure that children only access apps that are age-appropriate. You may refer to our client alert here for more details.

Key takeaways

Singapore has taken inspiration from Australia in its latest efforts to tackle online harms, including setting up an online safety centre to provide online harm victims with quicker assistance modelled after the Australia eSafety Commissioner. You may refer to our client alert here for more details.

A potential social media ban for children under 16 would also be part of a broader global trend to enhance protection for children on social media. For instance, countries such as France and some US states have enacted laws to restrict access for minors without parental permission.

If you wish to speak with us on any of the issues raised above, please reach out to us.

* * * * *

LOGO_Wong&Leow_Singapore

© 2025 Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow. All rights reserved. Baker & McKenzie. Wong & Leow is incorporated with limited liability and is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a global law firm with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a "principal" means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an "office" means an office of any such law firm. This may qualify as "Attorney Advertising" requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Copyright © 2025 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.