France: Clarification of the tax treatment of trust income under the French-US double tax treaty

French Administrative Supreme Court, opinion dated April 18, 2023, n°406825

In brief

The French Administrative Supreme Court asserts that non-discretionary revocable trusts established in the United States whose beneficiaries are US citizens who are French tax residents are not considered transparent under French tax law and, therefore, under the double tax treaty between France and the US.


Contents

In more detail 

At the request of the French Minister of the Economy, the French Administrative Supreme Court was asked to decide on whether, under the provisions of the French-US double tax treaty, income distributed by a non-discretionary revocable trust established in the United States should be considered to be directly derived by the US citizens who are French tax residents and who are settlor, trustees and beneficiaries of such trust.

In other words, the question asked was whether those trusts should be considered tax transparent under French law, in line with the tax treatment applicable in the United States.

The French Administrative Supreme Court first refers to French domestic law, pointing out that under the provisions of Article 120, 9o of the French Tax Code (FTC), income distributed by a trust within the meaning of Article 792-0 bis of the FTC is considered as income from securities issued outside France.

The French Administrative Supreme Court then refers to Article 4§3 of the French-US double tax treaty, which provides that, for its application, "an item of income, profit or gain derived through an entity that is fiscally transparent under the laws of either Contracting State, and that is formed or organized […] in either Contracting State […] shall be considered to be derived by a resident of a Contracting State to the extent that the item is treated for purposes of the taxation law of such Contracting State as the income, profit or gain of a resident". 

The French Administrative Supreme Court points out that the purpose of tax treaties is to allocate taxation between the contracting States and that, in principle and unless otherwise specified, they cannot modify domestic rules of local law. The Court underlines that the aforementioned Article of the tax treaty does not call into question or prevent the tax treatment of trust income under French domestic law since the French-US double tax treaty refers to the tax law of the beneficiaries' State of residence to determine whether the trust should be considered tax transparent. The Court states that the French-US double tax treaty does not preclude the application of the provisions of Article 120, 9o of the FTC to income paid by a trust established in the United States to a US citizen who is a French tax resident.

In addition, the French Administrative Supreme Court notes that trusts cannot be assimilated into partnerships within the meaning of the French administrative guidelines1.

With this opinion, the French Administrative Supreme Court rules out the transparency of revocable and non-discretionary trusts for the application of French law without entering into a detailed analysis of the various sub-types of trusts and the possible distinctions to be made. As a result, income that is not distributed by the trust is not subject to income tax, while distributed income will be taxed as investment income at a 30% "flat tax" rate (and 34% as the case may be). Unfortunately, by rendering its opinion on the absence of transparency of the trust, the French Administrative Supreme Court avoided answering the question of the tax credit which may apply in France, leaving US citizens who are French taxpayers taxed in the United States in a possible situation of double taxation.


1 BOI-INT-CVB-USA-10-20.


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.