United Kingdom: Reporting and transparency initiatives - New Mandatory Disclosure Rules in force

In brief

The so-called UK Mandatory Disclosure Rules (MDR) came into force in the UK on 28 March 2023. They comprise new cross-border tax avoidance arrangement disclosure rules that implement the OECD Model Mandatory Disclosure Rules.

This article appears in the second edition of the Private Wealth Newsletter 2023.


Contents

In more detail

Notably, the rules have global application, provided the taxpayer or their intermediary has a UK nexus and so are of considerable importance to many private clients who have implemented structures designed to protect their information from disclosure. Private clients and their advisers and other intermediaries should therefore consider the UK MDR carefully in the context of asset holding structures, including non-UK company, trust and other structures.

The new regulations are intended to replace the latest iteration of the DAC 6 rules, which were implemented in the UK. In-scope arrangements made available by intermediaries or implemented by taxpayers after 28 March 2023 must be reported to the UK tax authority, HMRC, within 30 days. Pre-existing arrangements will need to be reported within 180 days after the rules are implemented (i.e., by 25 September 2023). The look-back period for reporting pre-existing arrangements is 25 June 2018 (the same as DAC 6).

Scope of the rules

The scope of the UK MDR is limited to the two categories of arrangements described below. This reflects the way DAC 6 was implemented in the UK from 2021 whereby its application was limited to arrangements falling under Hallmark D of the EU Directive. However, the UK MDR extends the territorial scope such that certain arrangements that may not have been reportable under the UK DAC 6 regulations are reportable under the UK MDR. In particular, there will be no territorial limitations to the application of the UK MDR, resulting in in-scope arrangements and structures being reportable to HMRC, regardless of which jurisdictions are involved, as long as the intermediary or taxpayer has a UK nexus. A UK nexus may simply be where an intermediary provides services from a UK branch or office, or where the intermediary or taxpayer is tax resident in the UK. This will therefore be of particular note to international private clients who use UK-based advisers.

The new rules require intermediaries (for example, law firms or asset managers) that are incorporated, resident or have a place of management in the UK to make a report to HMRC with respect to one or both of the following if they make the structure or arrangement available for implementation or provide relevant services in relation to it through a branch or office located in the UK:

  1. “OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS) avoidance arrangement”.
  2. Opaque offshore structure.

“CRS avoidance arrangement” captures any arrangement “for which it is reasonable to conclude that it is designed to circumvent or is marketed as, or has the effect of, circumventing CRS legislation or exploiting an absence thereof.” There is an exemption from the look- back period in relation to CRS avoidance arrangements, where the amount involved is less than USD 1 million.

An opaque offshore structure is defined as being a passive offshore vehicle held through an opaque structure. This broadly covers entities that do not carry out any substantial economic activity supported by adequate staff in their country of residence and are designed to or have the effect of disguising or hiding the persons with beneficial ownership over it. Similarly, as under DAC 6, the question is whether beneficial ownership has been made “unidentifiable.” For these purposes, ownership does not need to be publicly available. Draft HMRC guidance confirms that ownership will not be made unidentifiable where the relevant tax authorities have mechanisms by which they can obtain this information. This should be carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis.

In addition, an exemption applies where relevant information has already been provided under DAC 6 and an intermediary is not required to disclose any information to the extent it is subject to legal professional privilege (but the taxpayer would be required to report).

How will this affect clients?

The introduction of the UK MDR is of particular importance to private clients and their structures, particularly given certain planning that may have been done in light of (often legitimate) concerns regarding the disclosure of beneficial ownership information in the public domain. However, clients need to be aware of potential reporting obligations on intermediaries or themselves (as reportable taxpayers), as well as the reporting obligations of intermediaries providing relevant services to them. Given the look-back period, it is important that all reporting obligations (even in respect of historic structures) are met by intermediaries and reportable taxpayers where appropriate.

Please click the link below for a more detailed overview of the new rules.

United Kingdom: Mandatory Disclosure Rules Come Into Force


Copyright © 2024 Baker & McKenzie. All rights reserved. Ownership: This documentation and content (Content) is a proprietary resource owned exclusively by Baker McKenzie (meaning Baker & McKenzie International and its member firms). The Content is protected under international copyright conventions. Use of this Content does not of itself create a contractual relationship, nor any attorney/client relationship, between Baker McKenzie and any person. Non-reliance and exclusion: All Content is for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal and regulatory developments. All summaries of the laws, regulations and practice are subject to change. The Content is not offered as legal or professional advice for any specific matter. It is not intended to be a substitute for reference to (and compliance with) the detailed provisions of applicable laws, rules, regulations or forms. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any action or refraining from taking any action based on any Content. Baker McKenzie and the editors and the contributing authors do not guarantee the accuracy of the Content and expressly disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of the consequences of anything done or permitted to be done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the Content. The Content may contain links to external websites and external websites may link to the Content. Baker McKenzie is not responsible for the content or operation of any such external sites and disclaims all liability, howsoever occurring, in respect of the content or operation of any such external websites. Attorney Advertising: This Content may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. To the extent that this Content may qualify as Attorney Advertising, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. Reproduction: Reproduction of reasonable portions of the Content is permitted provided that (i) such reproductions are made available free of charge and for non-commercial purposes, (ii) such reproductions are properly attributed to Baker McKenzie, (iii) the portion of the Content being reproduced is not altered or made available in a manner that modifies the Content or presents the Content being reproduced in a false light and (iv) notice is made to the disclaimers included on the Content. The permission to re-copy does not allow for incorporation of any substantial portion of the Content in any work or publication, whether in hard copy, electronic or any other form or for commercial purposes.